| Author |
Message |
outrage
Joined: 22 Nov 2006
Posts: 17
|
 Posted: 29 Oct 2007 21:37 Post subject: stats:just 244??? |
 |
|
hello...
i donīt understand. my stats in protectx are more less all the time then my stats in my script and at my traffictrdae. my adminpanel shows me 700 visitors in the last 24hours....
protectx shows just 244???
where could be the problem??? |
|
| Back to top |
|
Protect-X Support
Joined: 30 Oct 2006
Posts: 934
Rank: 35
|
| Posted: 30 Oct 2007 12:22 Post subject: |
|
|
hi,
protect-x statistics accuracy is interconnected with several factors such as place where you put include on your page, landing pages number etc.
most common reason of statistics difference is the fact that our script is included to a page bottom and some surfers (or bots) click thumbs without waiting whole page loading, hence Protect-X script can't detect such in.
_________________
Free A-B-C-D Hard Links Exchange Automatic System:
http://www.protect-x.com/index.php?go=shardlinks
Visit other Protect-X sections:
Find/Add NEW SPONSORS:
http://www.protect-x.com/index.php?go=findsponsors |
|
| Back to top |
|
smutnut
Joined: 21 Nov 2007
Posts: 4
|
| Posted: 22 Nov 2007 14:57 Post subject: |
|
|
| Like I said, I'm new here and still waiting to get verified, but I did find your stats to be closely comparible to google analytics from main root. That's what got me interested in here in the first place. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Protect-X Support
Joined: 30 Oct 2006
Posts: 934
Rank: 35
|
| Posted: 22 Nov 2007 17:06 Post subject: |
|
|
| smutnut wrote: | | Like I said, I'm new here and still waiting to get verified, but I did find your stats to be closely comparible to google analytics from main root. That's what got me interested in here in the first place. |
i don't know how to evaluate the fact you've stated. I'm afraid i can't compare Protect-X and Google  but you can tell me any inaccuracies you've noticed and it will be taken into account.
_________________
Free A-B-C-D Hard Links Exchange Automatic System:
http://www.protect-x.com/index.php?go=shardlinks
Visit other Protect-X sections:
Find/Add NEW SPONSORS:
http://www.protect-x.com/index.php?go=findsponsors |
|
| Back to top |
|
smutnut
Joined: 21 Nov 2007
Posts: 4
|
| Posted: 22 Nov 2007 17:43 Post subject: |
|
|
No, I meant they were accurate with google analytics, which I thought was good. I'm sure they will start varying as I start uping my traffic trades because all stat counters I use vary and I use many.
But starting out raw, they were accurate to google, which I think is what everyone considers gospel (which I haven't decided for myself is good or bad yet) |
|
| Back to top |
|
Protect-X Support
Joined: 30 Oct 2006
Posts: 934
Rank: 35
|
| Posted: 23 Nov 2007 14:58 Post subject: Statistics accuracy |
|
|
| smutnut wrote: | | I think is what everyone considers gospel (which I haven't decided for myself is good or bad yet) |
Big 'G' deserves to be a standard in many things connected with internet (not only from not long ago). Good or bad depends on how you learned to use it for yourself
_________________
Free A-B-C-D Hard Links Exchange Automatic System:
http://www.protect-x.com/index.php?go=shardlinks
Visit other Protect-X sections:
Find/Add NEW SPONSORS:
http://www.protect-x.com/index.php?go=findsponsors |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
