| Author |
Message |
trulymadly
Joined: 24 Dec 2006
Posts: 300
Rank: 40
|
 Posted: 29 Mar 2008 00:17 Post subject: SE is not a cheater, protect-x confirmed |
 |
|
I completely forgot Altavista is a SE ( or may be I was a bit drunk ), so when I see this site in my referring db, I click on the link and I thought, fuck this site has PR8.................
Then I remembered lol.
But the funniest line on the page got to be:
' Site altavista.com not found in our cheater database '
Anyone of you guys ever try to do a search on the trader list for a SE domain?
_________________
LiveJasmin NeonCams |
|
| Back to top |
|
bracey
Joined: 11 Apr 2007
Posts: 212
Rank: 11
|
|
| Back to top |
|
trulymadly
Joined: 24 Dec 2006
Posts: 300
Rank: 40
|
| Posted: 29 Mar 2008 01:23 Post subject: |
|
|
I will block them if Protect-X say its cheater but that is not the case lol.
But to tell you the truth, I think it cheats a little cause my site was never on the first page 
_________________
LiveJasmin NeonCams |
|
| Back to top |
|
max
Joined: 18 Oct 2006
Posts: 538
Rank: 38
|
| Posted: 31 Mar 2008 16:37 Post subject: |
|
|
| Altavista uses spiders i guess like other search engines. So it could be considered as robot traffic. It is the main problem for anticheat algorithm to distinguish valuable bot traffic and click-fraud bot traffic. |
|
| Back to top |
|
alex86
Joined: 20 Mar 2008
Posts: 44
Rank: 0
|
| Posted: 02 Apr 2008 07:24 Post subject: |
|
|
Guys. Actually it's not a problem. On the Web you can find databases of SE spiders IPs and mark such spider traffic somehow to ecape it's counting. However for qualitative DB you need to pay  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
