[speednic]

all user of this both scripts should be very very careful because of double (Proton) or triple (Progress) counting of hits and clicks. Effect on the newest versions.

There isn't any support over the last 2 weeks - without any answer from the script owner (not with ICQ, not within the Forum and not by Email) !!! Very unrecommended - so better to use other scripts !!!!

Problem is that any ratio (special in Proton) will be as 50% = 100% and any Return/Prod/Effect will be wrong and can destroy you trader handling !!!

[camchoice]

Does anyone know more about this ? I started using progress not too long ago as it was recommended by many people ..

[speednic]

you can verify it very easy as I have done it with my ProtonTM installs. Add a new trade domain (fresh one without any data) and put on that domain a simple hardlink/backlink. Click on the link and wait some time and see what happens in Proton stats.

After I had found out that shit stuff (validated with Protect-X, Sedotracker, ChCounter, ... stats) I was thinking to change to ProgressTM. But after that time I have signed up with one of my AT3 sites with a progressTM trade I stopped my idea to change.

I had seen in the progress stats (of the other trader) that all IN and OUT was counted in triple way as I had it in my AT3 stats. So would work better if all is in same multiply but not very recommanded.

Maybe the problem is a result of some server configuration but without any support from the owner I will never find out it.

[camchoice]

Thanks for that info, for now stats seem to be fine in my case.
I want to test more of these scripts to see which would be best to work with, actually the admin side of progress-tm was very promissing, not so confusing like others.

[speednic]

I have tested like each free scripts but each one has his own bad handling. FTT is very fine with trade handling but bad layout. ProtonTM has nice layout like AT3 but with counting the ratio handling needs some change. AT3 is very stable (first I used) but very insecure with bad traders/bots. GBscript has very bad trade handling. ProgressTM like Proton but with lower features in my eyes (like inspector). TTT wasn't mine.

I think FTT works as best trader handling. AT3 is best stable script. Proton has best features. So I was thinking in the past often to program my own script with best features of the three scripts Some stuff I had done but never a light on the end of the tunnel.

[trulymadly]

Did you not take a look or give ePower trader a trial?

I had use it in the past and it perform very well. The only reason of me switching from epower to at3 was the index page feature does not suit the sites I wish to develope at the moment.

[camchoice]

Progress seems to work for me , a bit concerned about the support though.
I have 1 site running on ATX (paid version) but I am not too happy with the whole interface and the constant updating .. This is why I was looking into other scripts